Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 14 post(s) |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
131
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 15:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
So the only attack BB is going to be a missile boat. I am not saying that the new phoon isn't going to be decent. I just don't like projectiles being omitted out of a whole subclass of ships when it is the signature weapon of the race.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
135
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 16:43:00 -
[2] - Quote
BABARR wrote:Tempest still need love. 7 gun (+1) remove a mid for a low to make a real gunboat like huricane or rupy, could be a good idea.
Please consider doing this given what is happening to the Mega.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
135
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 18:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
BABARR wrote:Krell Kroenen wrote:BABARR wrote:Tempest still need love. 7 gun (+1) remove a mid for a low to make a real gunboat like huricane or rupy, could be a good idea. Please consider doing this given what is happening to the Mega. The mega is now designed to become a shield/DPS big boat, like a big talos. Maybe not a great idea, but i'am ont his thread to speak about minmatar boat, and when i see the epic new typhoon, i find the tempest more crap than before, and god, it was already crap. So making it a REAL gunboat armor, (maybe whith short powergrid or cpu to not be able to fit bigger gun too easy, or very small drone bay for the balance) could be a good idea.
Well all I was saying was that given the changes that CCP is thinking about doing to the Mega I need a replacement gunboat and 7 lows and 7 guns on the tempest would most likely fit that bill.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
140
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 15:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
I fear that racial traits are being scrubbed away in the name of balancing. No one is really saying that the ship changes being purposed makes these ships non-viable. But they really don't feel very minmatar either. Perhaps one day we will all be flying the same ship but with different colors and shapes to chose from. *shrugs*
It would explain why this thread hasn't seen any Dev replies. From their point of view they are happy with the balancing results, and we really can't say they aren't balanced. The main complaints in this thread are about how the ships feel. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
142
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 15:48:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rebecha Pucontis wrote:Krell Kroenen wrote:No one is really saying that the ship changes being purposed makes these ships non-viable. Yes, they certainly are. Although as you say the Typhoon is having its unique minmatar flavour wiped away and essentially being turned into an armored raven, it would still be a useful ship for sure. But that is not the case with the Tempest. I can't see any useful role for it now which either another ships, or simply the maelstrom would perform much better.
I will confess that I haven't used any of my Tempests in some time. Especially after the Teir 3 BC's came out. And you make a good point that the proposed changes most likely won't change that. What stood out to me about it was that it was gaining sig and some hit points. Which isn't very matar like. But because the ship was already pretty much retired for my uses and the changes didn't inspire me to reconsider that status, I failed to really look at it further.
For that I apologize.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
142
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 16:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hey guys
We're going to post a few tweaks tomorrow based on feedback from all the threads, minmatar included.
To answer a couple things though -
I think the comparison between the raven and the typhoon is kind of surprising. Both ships will now be able to field 6 missile launchers, so they have that in common, but thats really where it stops. The typhoon is the fastest of all the battleships by a substantial margin. It has the fastest align time and fastest mwd speed of anything available. This strikes me as very 'minmatar'. Along with that, while its losing some of the extreme versatility it had before, it still supplies quite a few options both offensively and defensively, while the Raven is quite clearly a dedicated shield ship.
As for the tempest, I think what we are now looking at is having the tempest be part of the 'attack' category as well as the typhoon. It already behaves more or less like an attack ship, and maybe adding hp and increasing sig wasn't adding much to the overall ship. So we will likely bring the sig back down to near where it was before, take some of the hp back, and increase its speed slightly.
Both ships will still offer flexibility in the way they are used that is fairly unique to minmatar.
Check back for tweaks in the next couple days and keep the feedback coming =)
Two attack battleships, one missile and one gun based does make me feel better, didn't feel right to leave projectiles out of a whole subclass. And if the Tempest can hang with the other attack battleships when it is all said and done then I would love to dust off my old hulls, and bring them back to life.
Thank you.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
145
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 17:00:00 -
[7] - Quote
SMT008 wrote: Thank you for the Tempest. I think that some changes to the slot layout would immensely help the Tempest toward shield tanking. So that we have one Armor Attack BS (Typhoon) and one Shield Attack BS (Tempest).
The only problem I have with that is then there is no armor tanking projectile battleship for Matar :( Don't kill my armor gun boat option please. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
146
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:29:00 -
[8] - Quote
I know the shield tankers are salivating over the concept of a 7/6/6 tempest but as an armor tanker that 6th mid doesn't bring much to the table. And I imagine those calling for a fallout bonus are looking for a poor man's Mach.
I don't fault them for those wants. But they don't match my own. I rather have the slot lay and hull bonuses to remain the same as they fit my style of play better. *shrugs*
As for the rest of the stats I do find it odd that the mega is faster than the tempest. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
147
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 14:44:00 -
[9] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: The extra mid can be used for a track computer . or some soft e -war. OR you could simply bide for a low slot instead of mid :P 7/5/7 would be nice as well.
Well with 5 slots you can do prop, web, point, and a TC and ewar on a armor tank if you want.. a 6th slot.. seems over kill
I would love a 7/5/7, I won't lie but I think some people might feel that would put the ship in the realm armor tanking too strongly. Even though there is the Maelstrom as the shield gunboat. I can understand why people that like to shield tank, wouldn't favor it due to it's speed and agility. I just don't want the shield tankers to push the tempest to much in to their realm.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
148
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 16:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Pattern Clarc wrote:Maelstrom: No change: OK Tempest: A little on the slow side or should become a real shield tanker with 7/6/6 Typhoon: Pretty good so far, maybe a little bit more grid/fittings.
Either way, drastic changes from this point would probably upset more people than they would please. Just tweaks needed I think. To be frank I stil woudl prefer tempest as 7/5/7 because then we have an oficial armor tanker (I suspect the phoon will be used much more as a shield FAT BC / FAT stealth bomber.
It's a sad state of affairs when every one wants to shield tank everything because armor tanking is sub-par now a days in most realms. Even in the Gallente thread the calls to shield tank the mega makes my skin crawl but can I really blame them? As I stated before I would love a 7/5/7 armor pest, but that is more of a want rather than an element of balance or rather I can't out right say it needs it.
Especially since the stats of the other battleships still seem to be in flux. What I can say is I don't think the mega should be faster than the tempest. The same perhaps but not faster. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
149
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 17:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: To be fair.. current tempest proposl has MORE tank thatn current mega proposal. Only the mega low slots cancel that completely. And taht is the problem
I was thinking of the 8 lows on the mega when I made my post perhaps I shouldn't have. So what do you think the problem is really and what is your solution to it? |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
149
|
Posted - 2013.04.11 20:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: My opinion is that EVE has become a specialization game. That means you must be good at something that is your focus.
The tempest is simply stuck into 2 bonuses that do the same thing but still not well enough to compensate its 6 turrets and low drone bay size AND lack of enough low slots to fit tank and several damage modules. its a counter productive ship. All tis bonus goes to damage but all its slots layout produces is a subpar shield tanker or a n armor tanker without possibility for enough damage.
The fact that 1 damage mod makes MORE DIFFERENCE than 1 of the tempest bonus is the reason for that. the tempest with only 1 bonus but +1 free low slot would be STRONGER than it currently is.
Tempest would need a 7th low to compete directly with the megatron in a combat scenario usign its current bonuses. That means -1H +1 low
Or it can be made even more minmatar. Reduce tempest to 7k/7k/6.5k. increase its speed to 125ms. Increase its agility to .11
Or you can make the tempest into a different boat. I would love a really different ship. Something like 7.5% rof per level and 15% AB bonus per level (and reduce its mass to close to megathron levels) . I know its niche, but its very minmatar and would not need any slot changes.
There are lot of options, but the real issue of the tempest is related to its slot layout being inefficient for a damage focused ship ( taking from 2 damage bonus on the hull).
If i was to redesign the minmatar line as a whole. I would have made almost the same typhoon as rise. But would have changed the other 2. Would have made the maelstrom 5% rof 10% hitpoint of shield per level. Slow.. a true SHIP OF THE LINE. Would have made the tempest a 7.5% rof and 7.5% shield boost per level and 7/6/6 or 8/6/5, 100mbit bay. But faster than any battleship But the typhoon.
I see, well as I have leaned, raw numbers don't always paint a clear picture for me on how well I will like a ship. I was pretty sure I would be abandoning the use of the cane after it got nerfed but I found out later that for me it still fit my play style better then the other bc's most of the time. Even though the numbers at face value told me I wouldn't.
The problem I face with the Tempest is that I stop using it once I got enough skills to use the phoon decently and then I stop using the phoon for a number of reasons (mainly because I couldn't move up to T2 fittings with the fit I liked the most). So after the Hybrid turret buff I moved to the Mega and been there ever since as my go to BB. It doesn't help that the tier 3 BC's have trampled a bit on the Tempest's turf either.
But I never stop looking back at the tempest, heck I stared at it numerous times after it got its visual face lift. But I couldn't really embrace it when compared to the other ships in my hanger. Hopefully after these changes I will be able too, and I won't fully judge it until I kick the tires so to speak. Yet I am not seeing anything off hand to be excited about with the ship, and I have my doubts about it vs some of the other attack BB's , if it does need tweaks then I hope it receives them before it goes live. But for all that is holy leave it able to armor tank CCP *smirks* |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
151
|
Posted - 2013.04.24 16:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
Rebecha Pucontis wrote: Also, nothing to dramatic on the Tempest please from my point of view. I think it is looking good at the moment. Perhaps the bonuses could be looked at and a few tweaks to the attributes but I wouldn't want to see a slot layout change personally.
I think the Tempest could use some more tweaking, there are a number directions that CCP could take if they chose to do so. And I am not going to pretend to know the best one to take. I can only state my personal desires on the matter. In truth that all any of us can do. I just want the Tempest to be a competitive projectile armed battleship that can armor tank. If that can be done with out changing it's slot lay out then all the better. But if it turns out that CCP believes that changing the slot lay out will result in a ship that will be viable and usable in more situations then I wouldn't want to tie their hands to having to stay with one concept.
To be truthful I am not expecting CCP to get the Tempest right the first time, but what I am hoping for is that they will come back and revisit the ship like they did the Stabber. I think real world data will go a long way to highlight any short comings the Tempest may have in comparison to the other attack battleships. My arty and auto cannon Tempest hulls have been pretty much been in mothballs since the Tornado and blaster buff came about accordingly. So I can wait a while longer if need be to fly them again.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
152
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 19:11:00 -
[14] - Quote
Wrayeth wrote:Pattern Clarc wrote: Minmatar Battleship Skill Bonuses: +8% bonus to Large Projectile Turret rate of fire +10% bonus to Large Projectile Falloff
Slot layout: 7H, 6M, 6L; 6 turrets , 4 launchers Fittings: 17000 PWG, 650 CPU Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 7300 / 7400 / 6400 Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / cap per second) : 5400(+87.5) / 1154s / 4.68 Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 120 / .104 / 101000000 Drones (bandwidth / bay): 75 / 75 Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 67.5km(+5k) / 100 / 7 Sensor strength: 20 Ladar Sensor Strength(+1) Signature radius: 360(+20)
This really doesn't interest me. It doesn't do anything for the Tempest's anemic DPS, doesn't do much for its mobility over Rise's currently proposed change, and pigeon-holes the tempest into a shield fit. Sure, you could still armor tank it, but what, exactly, are you going to do with that extra mid? * The days of overpowered sensor dampers are long since gone * Tracking disruptors have also been nerfed for non-bonused ships (and your sig is the size of a small moon anyway). * The Multispec of DoomGäó hasn't been viable for 7 years (I used to fly with one fit to my Tempest from 2005 until when it got the axe, and it really did need nerfing - I once kept a Blasterthron jammed for an entire fight with just one multispec while I slowly chewed him to pieces). * Target painters could help somewhat when dealing with smaller opponents, but again they don't have enough of an effect on a non-bonused ship. I suppose you could use a dual-prop fit and gain a marginal boost when you're scrambled, but since you're a battleship and slow to begin with, it really wouldn't be the most helpful thing in the universe. Now let's look at what you give up for that single midslot which is nearly useless on an armor fit: 1 heavy neutralizer. It doesn't sound like much, but this can be the difference between capping out your opponent and turning off such unimportant things as the warp scrambler keeping you from MWDing to maintain range and the ancillary armor rep that's keeping him alive, and dying because you weren't able to do those things. IMO, the only thing worth giving up the second neut for is a 7th turret slot like the Machariel has. TLDR; Do. Not. Want.
Pretty Much this, 6 mid slots doesn't thrill me much either for the record.
|

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
153
|
Posted - 2013.05.02 20:13:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote: And can be made into an excelent shield ship.
And there is the gist of it, the main agenda for the 6 mids slot push is to make an excellent shield ship nothing more or less. And while having the 6th midslot might allow for some colorful gimmicks on an armor tank none of them really shine. Even by your own use of the words good in comparison with the word excellent shows your own thoughts on the matter. I am sorry that the Maelstrom isn't the poor man's Mach that so many people want the Tempest to be. But the matar already have a shield tanking projectile battleship. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
159
|
Posted - 2013.05.06 19:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Pattern Clarc wrote:Another day, no more feedback. And this thread has died a death. The dead horse thoroughly beaten?
Well it seems dead now but perhaps once the BB changes are on SiSi, CCP will come looking for feedback on how they perform there. But for now I am not expecting them to say much of anything till then. |

Krell Kroenen
Miners In Possession
165
|
Posted - 2013.05.17 21:58:00 -
[17] - Quote
I think I am just going to have to accept the fact that the Tempest will be left subpar and just hope it get's reviewed down the road, hopefully sooner rather than later. Tis a shame really since I rather like the new model.  |
|
|